The Hidden King: Camelot ruled from the Cave of Merlin by Miles Mathis

PAPER UPDATE by Miles Mathis: added March 25, 2015. The Hidden King: Camelot ruled from the Cave of Merlin. I have added another 25 pages of explosive evidence, most of it old photographs. Via this evidence, I should change my title to Hidden Kings.

Screen Shot 2015-03-30 at 9.32.57 AM

The Hidden King: Camelot ruled from the Cave of Merlin

By Miles Mathis


Please go to Miles Amthis’ web site to read The Hidden King: Camelot ruled from the Cave of Merlin

At the Waldorf-Austoria Hotel in New York before the American Newspaper Publishers Association at a Bureau Advertising Dinner on April 27, 1961, John F. Kennedy mentions the “national security state”, but this is not the first time nor is it the last time John Kennedy mentions the “national security state”. In his speech President Kennedy addresses his discontent with the press’s news coverage of the Bay of Pigs incident, suggesting that there is a need for “far greater public information” and “far greater official secrecy.” Just how much secrecy is needed to run an “under ground government” with all subsequent presidents since 1947 being the titular head only of that government?

JFK’s Secret Societies Speech (full version)

Outtakes with President John F. Kennedy during an NBC-TV interview on September 9, 1963, two months before John Kennedy’s assassination. Chet Huntley and David Brinkley of NBC News conducted the interview from the Oval Office in the White House with Kennedy. During the interview, Kennedy stopped the interview and wanted to go over with Chet Huntley and David Brinkley his responses to their questions before being released to the public. John Kennedy knew how to use the press and was also savvy about using the news media to his advantage.


Ignore what Kennedy is saying and pay very close attention to the very carefully scripted underlying message being delivered: the “national security state.” This isn’t the first time Kennedy discusses the “national security state.” Even though the “cold war” had been started the “national security state” was not that well developed. In his speech before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, 27 April 1961 in the video clip above, John Kennedy mentioned the “national security state.” Was John Kennedy part of the “national security state” and the CIA provided the assassination production rather than being the enemy of John Kennedy as history has suggested? Perhaps JFK was an integral part of the creation of the “national security state” and he wasn’t the enemy of what was being created beginning in 1947 with the passing of the National Security Act before the “cold war” officially started as we have been led to believe all through these intervening years since 1962.

The journalist narrating in this clip was preprogramming his audience’s perceptions for the scenario to come. He is obviously reading from a script. What sort of person would have written it? Well, Aldous Huxley is alleged to have died that day (Nov. 22, 1963); Marshall McLuhan springs more immediately to mind. Someone of that type perhaps?. Or a Masonic historian. Intelligence spookery is all over this news coverage. Then the reporter goes on to describe motorcade route in Dallas. Why would he do that other than to program the public for the coming “assassination.” That’s like broadcasting to the hit teams in Dallas to get ready. Is a kitchen a more secure entry/exit route from a hotel (Hotel Texas, in this case)? Is that standard protocol? Someone obviously used that idea with the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. The foreshadowing in this video clip is quite uncanny.

The scriptwriter may be telling an inside joke: This is the crowd as they shake hands with President Kennedy. He’s making his way through the crowd. We have a looong microphone, which is about 14 inches long; it looks sort of like a long pistol. Secret Service agent approached us and says, “Just don’t put that in front of the President. Who are these two male reporters, and what are their networks? We need names of these reporters.


John Kennedy’s speech about “secret societies” in the clip above, it was intended to reconfirm the “national security state“. He was talking about “securing the homeland” and requesting the media to cooperate in its creation. In this clip, Kennedy mentions all the defense contractors located in the Fort Worth area of Texas that benefited from recent government expenditures for the military buildup that at the time was accelerating. Listening to Kennedy’s remarks in the following clip it does not sound like the Kennedy who was “opposed to the coming war in Vietnam.” In this same speech, Kennedy again mentions the importance of the “national security state.” The National Security Act of 1947 passed under Truman as the above analysis suggests, “provided for the creation of real government agencies, funded by real tax dollars, so that the underground government could tap the treasury in a semi-legal fashion. The underground government could use federal tax dollars directly to steal elections, fight secret foreign wars, and run all sorts of clandestine operations both foreign and domestic.” All this would require a “national security state” to be in place.

JFK Fort Worth Breakfast November 22,1963 TV coverage

The next clip is President Dwight Eisenhower’s Farewell Address to the nation on January 17, 1961. In this famous speech about the military industrial complex, can it be inferred Eisenhower was perhaps intending to vector attention away from banking and finance and place the entire blame on the Pentagon for the threat of the military-industrial complex?

Eisenhower Farewell Address (Full)

In this talk that John Kennedy gave to the nation on “civil rights” and “equality” on national television, the first thing that comes to mind watching this clip considering John Kennedy’s oligarchic family background, is do the same standards of “civil rights” and “equality” apply to oligarchs as they apply to the American people?

The Last Word – John F. Kennedy’s ‘finest moment’

Listening carefully to the comments given by Harry Truman (Pendergast criminal mob) on November 23, 1063 on the death of John Kennedy, Truman does not sound that visibly upset or appalled by the news of Kennedy’s death. It is hard to tell since Truman was used to giving public addresses, but it almost sounds as if presidents getting shot was an every day common occurrence. If Truman was the titular head of the government acting as a front man for the “national security state” under Joseph Kennedy Jr, his seemingly casual remarks about Kennedy’ death might make more sense now.

November 23, 1963 – Harry Truman’s reaction to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy

Former President Dwight Eisenhower is interviewed on hearing the news of Kennedy’s death as he leaves a meeting at the United Nations in New York City on November 22, 1963. With his unique perspective on national and international events and history, Eisenhower gives his commentary to the reporters about the present and the future of the United States in learning of Kennedy’s alleged death.

Eisenhower Speaks About Murder of JFK (1963)

A new twist on the concept of the “Breakaway civilization” and the “assassination” of John F. Kennedy

When I first started discovering more information about what is claimed to be in existence referred to as a “breakaway civilization”, I decided to go back and listen more carefully to Catherine Austin Fitts who publishes the Solari Report of her understanding of a “parallel finance system” and the “US black budget.” After reading and watching YouTube video clips related to the events of the death of John F. Kennedy, the national security state was set up in 1947 which is a hugely important date. Why the intense focus on a “national security state” for the past 68 years? What does the assassination of John F. Kennedy have to do with the national security state? To get a solid foundation for understanding what the “parallel financial system” is and what Catherine Austin Fitts describes as the “black budget”, please first view the presentation given by Catherine Austin Fitts at the Secret Space Program Conference, 2014 San Mateo, California posted below. It is very important. The death of John F. Kennedy is an extremely significant event and is the basis of the “breakaway civilization.” Since there is so much information on this subject and it is enormously complex, it is suggested that posts will be provided from this point forward to lay out the evidence as it relates to John F. Kennedy and the “breakaway civilization.”

Catherine Austin Fitts at the Secret Space Program Conference, 2014 San Mateo

There are no “well engineered people”, only well engineered motorcycles

Businesses are not built by empty talk and grubbing for money from others

This is a Triumph motorcycle which was designed and engineered almost to perfection. It is a very high quality motorcycle built for agility, speed and road flexibility. The yellow motorcycle in the background is an Italian-manufactured Ducati. It is too bad I didn’t get involved in going to Qatar with “equally well engineered people” who lured me into their business failures. A business is built not by just talking about it and making highly exaggerated claims, that is deception and false representation, but rather by investing the energy, time and money into building something solid and lasting.



I spent the last two months building this motorcycle shop for my son from the very beginning when this rental property was empty. It was done in the cold of winter all the while with a horrible incurable sinus infection. The reason I could focus so hard on building this motorcycle shop, was to compensate for my failure to see the fraud that was perpetrated on me concerning Qatar. Building this shop for my son almost killed me. It was physically exhausting especially just after going through massive failure in Qatar with these incredibly incompetent Japanese people I mistakenly became involved with. I think back now on the money I wasted on Qatar could have been invested in my son’s business for tools, materials and supplies. I have been compromised financially by these Japanese people who acted way above their own self-exaggerated claims about their ability to do business in Qatar.

The ONLY redeeming aspect of my experience in Qatar was the food

About the ONLY redeeming aspect of spending so much money and effort in Qatar and prior to going was the food served at the hotels I stayed at. The food was marvelously displayed and had a variety I haven’t seen after years of living in Japan where the food is monotonous and all homogenized. The below image was the breakfast I had at the Marriott Hotel the first morning after staying at the Marriott. I woke up early just to go down to the restaurant to get a comfortable seat and to meagerly enjoy the experience at having access to such well prepared and delicious cheeses, breads, different types of meat including thinly sliced smoked ham – in an Islamic country?! – humus that knocked my socks off, different types of cheese spreads, sauteed mushrooms, the best tasting coffee I have ever had and various soups. Humus on that thin bread between sips of coffee was exquisite. A breakfast like that in Japan with just this plate with a meager serving would run a person easily US$75 to US$100 in any good hotel in Tokyo. The disparities were astonishing. The average person in Japan couldn’t even imagine a breakfast like this and even while eating this food I only took meager portions. I am not shitting, there was nothing left on my plate not even a speck of a bread crumb or smattering of cheese residue.


Notice the blue cheese on the upper right on the plate. That was the best blue cheese I have ever had in my life – try finding blue cheese in Japan without having to take out a fucking bank loan to pay for it – I savored every small bite. The humus was marvelous and haven’t had it in many years. It was the highlight of my breakfast. The food was so good that during breakfast because of this rare indulgence I had nearly forgotten about the incompetent Japanese people I left behind in Japan on this trip to Qatar.


Japan in meltdown and leads the way with “female” sex robots

Over the years I have noticed how the Japanese have focused their attention on building the world’s first fully automated sex robot and they are always designed by male engineers and of young “females.” What is it about the Japanese with this weird infatuation with designing and building female robots for , well you guessed it, almost anything sexual that can be done with a “female” robot. It is a rather well known fact Japanese men are lonely, even married Japanese men. Can anyone imagine in the coming years Japanese men going on shopping visits to a sex robot store to pick out their own personally ordered female robot ordered to “specifications? Imagine group sex parties in which Japanese men share their own personal female love robots with other attendees of robot sex parties to compare abilities of their fully automated sex robots?

This article appeared at
Truth Stream Media

Screen Shot 2015-02-26 at 8.40.43 PM

A Future Filled with Sex Robots: The Downfall of Humanity in One YouTube Comment Thread

We are such toys to the powers that shouldn’t be… and many of us, sleepwalking through our lives glued to our electronic eye candy, are clueless to the bigger neo-eugenics agenda claiming us. Having learned to fully love our servitude, we’re playing right into their hands.

by Melissa Melton | Originally posted at The Daily Sheeple

Check out the comments in this YouTube video “The Most Realistic Artifical Women Ever” (sic) regarding Japan’s latest claim that they have now created the most realistic fake woman ever.

The Most Realistic Artificial Women Ever

Between being heralded as the next best thing since sliced bread that will save the world from everything from STDs to unwanted children to war to fundamentally changing all of society as we know it, the male/female arguments over the coming silicone fembot sex revolution shows why humanity is, for lack of a better term and pardon the pun, screwed.

Key knowledge implanted in the DNA – Off earth species spliced our DNA (see related article)

This article appeared
at Nautilus

Is DNA the Language of the Book of Life?

Screen Shot 2015-02-27 at 9.23.35 PMThinking of nucleobases as a long sequence of letters may contribute to the illusion that DNA is a language.Neil Palmer / CIAT via Flickr

When we talk about genes, we often use expressions inherited from a few influential geneticists and evolutionary biologists, including Francis Crick, James Watson, and Richard Dawkins. These expressions depict DNA as a kind of code telling bodies how to form. We speak about genes similarly to how we speak about language, as symbolic and imbued with meaning. There is “gene-editing,” and there are “translation tables” for decoding sequences of nucleic acid. When DNA replicates, it is said to “transcribe” itself. We speak about a message—such as, build a tiger! or construct a female!—being communicated between microscopic materials. But this view of DNA has come with a price, argue some thinkers. It is philosophically misguided, they say, and has even led to scientific blunders. Scratch the surface of this idea, and below you’ll find a key contradiction.

Since the earliest days of molecular biology, scientists describe genetic material to be unlike all other biological material, because it supposedly carries something that more workaday molecules don’t: information. In a 1958 paper, Crick presented his ideas on the importance of proteins for inheritance, and said that they were composed of energy, matter, and information. Watson called DNA the “repository” of information.

Less than a decade later, George Williams, an influential evolutionary biologist, elaborated on this idea. He described genes to have a special status distinct from DNA, and to be the message that the DNA delivers. In a later work, he likened genes to ideas contained in books. A book can be destroyed, but the story inside is not identical to the physical book. “The same information can be recorded by a variety of patterns in many different kinds of material. A message is always coded in some medium, but the medium is really not the message.” In his book The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins gives perhaps the most forthright description of this view: “airborne willow seeds… are, literally, spreading instructions for making themselves… It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs; it’s raining tree-growing, fluff-spreading, algorithms. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs.”

But do genes truly contain information in the same sense as words, books, or floppy discs? It depends on what we mean by information. If it’s the meaning represented by the words, books, or floppy disks, then no. Many philosophers agree that this kind of semantic information requires communication: an agent to create the message and another to interpret it. “Genes don’t carry semantic information, though. They weren’t made as part of an act of communication. So genes don’t literally represent anything, as people sometimes say,” explains Peter Godfrey-Smith, a professor of philosophy at CUNY.

“Airborne willow seeds are, literally, spreading instructions for making themselves. It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs.”

Some philosophers argue that this confusion causes real problems—that, for instance, it is the reason scientists did not fully appreciate the significance of epigenetics until relatively recently. The focus on genes as carriers of semantic information discouraged scientists from looking for other influences on our biology, such as our environment. “Whereas genes are thus informational on this view, environments are not,” writes professor of bioethics Jason Scott Robert in his book Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution. Epigenetics “was staring biologists in the face since the early 20th century but mostly swept under the rug as phenomena they couldn’t explain,” says James Griesemer, a professor of philosophy at University of California, Davis. DNA sequences were vastly more important than, for example, DNA methylation in shaping an organism, according to this view. For decades, this blind spot has held back our understanding of questions where some researchers have recently been focusing on epigenetics—for example, cancer, dementia, and heart disease.

Susan Oyama, professor emeritus at John Jay College, has spent her career pointing to evolutionary biology’s blinkered view, and describes this special focus on genes to be a metaphysical assumption about who we are. It’s “an intuition of an essence that tends not to be made explicit,” she says. She adds that this has had practical effects on the study of sex difference, because it encourages scientists to see difference as fixed and arising solely from our genetic blueprints.

Indeed, it seems were are only now just beginning to shake off the powerful hold genes have had on our imaginations. Chip Rowe’s story about genetic testing in this issue of Nautilus points to the ways we overemphasize the role genes play in predicting disease.

There is no need for an intelligent sender or receiver; the receiver can be a machine or even a protein.

This is not to say that the language of genetic information has not been very helpful, or that it should be abandoned. What these philosophers and thinkers care to do is draw attention to the ways that scientists fail to fully consider the language they use, and so inhibit scientific progress.

To avoid theoretical confusion, some researchers have adopted a different concept of information. In 1948 American mathematician Claude Shannon developed a way to measure data between a sender and a receiver. His theory has a few advantages over the semantic view of information. There is no need for an intelligent sender or receiver; the receiver can be a machine or even a protein. There is also no need to talk about representation, because all that matters is whether the data is successfully transferred—not whether someone understood the meaning of the message.

Using Shannon’s model, a gene can be said to carry information when its sequence is transferred from DNA to mRNA. “What’s present in all these cases is not a special sort of ‘informational’ relationship between things, but just ordinary causal relationships that are being described in a special quantitative way,” writes Godfrey-Smith in an email. That is, information in Shannon’s sense has no meaning, but does affect reality.

So, perhaps there’s really no information in genes, except in a metaphorical sense. And there’s really nothing wrong with using metaphors in science, as long as we see them for what they are. In the words of Herbert Spencer, a proponent of evolutionary theory and contemporary of Darwin, “How often misused words generate misleading thoughts.”

Regan Penaluna is a Nautilus editorial intern.


Please read this important article related to DNA:

Ucadia vs. Illuminati and Global Elite – Part 2 And the Origin of the Species and Source of Elite Power

More news about cannabis in treating cancer

This information appeared

Research Proving Cannabis Kills Cancer Cells Safely has been Suppressed Since 1974

Nov 23 • Big Pharma, Government Watch, Medical Marijuana • 4861 Views • Comments Off

Watch: Incredible Microscopic Footage Of Cannabis Oil Eliminating Cancer Cells


Remember the hassles Rick Simpson went through in his Canadian Nova Scotia town trying to bring the cannabis oil cures he and others used to cure themselves of various cancers? Rick assumed the world was ready for him to share the good news from his and his townspeople’s experiences.

After several attempts to get cannabis oil allowed through the court system with many testimonials from those who had been helped, Rick realized this important harsh reality: The cancer industry does not want a cure for cancer.

He was growing the hemp on his land, making the cannabis oil, and sharing it without cost to those who had needed it after curing his skin cancer and a fiercely intense neurological post concussion disorder from a head injury that pharmaceuticals only exacerbated. The townspeople were cured of several disorders, including lung cancer. All of them had been failed by mainstream medicine.

Rick removed himself from Canada and exiled himself to Amsterdam, Netherlands, at first. Now he tours the world spreading the wonders of cannabis healing to whomever is willing to listen. You can view his full length documentary below.
The Constantly Disappearing Cannabis Research from 1974

In 1974, the NIH (National Institutes of Health) funded the Medical College of Virginia to prove that cannabis hampers the immune system and destroys brain cells. This was research ammunition that the DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency), initiated under the Nixon administration to further justify throwing pot smokers into prison.

Unfortunately for the DEA and the war on drugs, the researchers came upon some interesting results with their lab rats. They discovered that cancer cells were getting destroyed, not healthy cells. The immune systems were enhanced, not impeded. Well, that was the end of that research.

Their funding was canceled at the behest of the DEA, and the research documents were destroyed. In 1976, president Gerald Ford halted all research on cannabis except for Big Pharma’s attempts at creating synthetic THC. In 1983, other college research centers who were privy to copies of the Virginia research documents were urged by the Reagan administration to destroy them. The memory hole mission for cannabis curing cancer was complete, almost.

The Virginia medical college applied for research grants for further inquiry into cannabis’ healing potentials in 1996 and 2006, both denied. Their 1974 studies were ignored by the mainstream media except for one short mention of it in the Local Section of the Washington Post.

The documents went into such a memory hole that researchers in Madrid, Spain’s 2000 huge breakthrough study of cannabis TCH cannabinoid effects on cancer couldn’t get them for their paper. Madrid’s lead researcher, Dr. Manual Guzman commented: “I am aware of the existence of that research. In fact I have attempted many times to obtain the journal article on the original investigation by these people, but it has proven impossible.”

This statement was made when an independent investigative journalist got document copies from a California university and faxed them over. By then, the Madrid study was completed.

But even the Madrid breakthrough research on rats was ignored by virtually all of our mainstream media. Not only did this study prove efficacy on reducing brain cancer tumors in rats, they also tested healthy rats with THC to see if there were any harmful effects. They found no harmful effects on normal brain tissues.

Currently, two large hospitals in Israel, Sheba and Abarbanel, are doing successful clinical studies and treatments on humans with cannabis for several maladies, funded by the Israeli government. But our mainstream media can’t touch that.

Rick Simpson got more favorably objective TV media coverage in Canada when he was trying to bring cannabis curing cancer to the attention of everyone in circa 1999. By the way, he wasn’t trying to “cash in” with any patents.

[Suggested Reading: U.S. Government Has Patents on Cannabis]

Anecdotal Testimonies and Independent Studies Confirm Cannabis Cancer Efficacy and Safety

Anyone who views alternative health information on the internet isn’t blocked by mainstream media’s lack of exposure. There have been many anecdotal recoveries from terminal cancer recorded by people as old as 80. Kudos to Dr. Sanjay Gupta of CNN for doing a public 180 reversal on his previous anti-cannabis stance while covering cannabis healing among extremely epileptic children.

Obviously, cannabis is both effective and safe. It induces apoptosis on tumor cancer cells. Apoptosis is cellular programmed cell death (PCD) that’s part of normal cells die-off and replacement from new cells. But cancer tumor cells don’t do apoptosis. They just keep on going and expanding. Cannabinoids also curb angiogenis, which tumors use to develop blood vessels that supply glucose for their metabolism.

So cannabis induces apoptosis to kill cancer cells and inhibits angiogenis to cut off their food supplies. And as the Madrid study proved and anyone who has used or uses cannabis can testify, healthy cells are not harmed. That’s what standard oncology’s treatments do.

It’s easily arguable that many of the cancer deaths reported are actually from the chemo and radiation treatments. But the Medical Mafia family doesn’t say that. They say death from cancer. Meanwhile fund raisers keep duping suckers into contributing money, time, and energy to find that cure for cancer.

Cannabis caveats: Smoking is the least effective for curing. Using a vaporizer or “vaping” is better. Ingesting cannabis oils or pastes is the best approach. But – ignoring lifestyle and diet habit changes can reverse what’s gained from any alternative cancer treatments.

Here’s an example of a baby who was cured of brain cancer without being subjected to the cruelties of surgery, radiation, or brain cancer. Instead, he was given cannabis oil via his pacifier. The baby was completely cured within eight months. After two months of observed progress, the pediatric oncologist who had given the diagnosis called off any future treatments that would cause more damage, calling him a miracle baby.

This short video report of that “miracle baby” is complete with brain scans showing progress and recovery, which only the Huffington Post reported within what’s considered mainstream media.

Cannabis oil cures baby of an Inoperable Brain Tumor says Dr.William Courtney

For those who demand scientific studies, there is a list of many here and others here as well.


Paul Fassa is a contributing staff writer for His pet peeves are the Medical Mafia’s control over health and the food industry and government regulatory agencies’ corruption. Paul’s valiant contributions to the health movement and global paradigm shift are world renowned. Visit his blog by following this link and follow him on Twitter here.